to trabant and makiak....
I worked professionally for a number of years using very traditional techniques and materials.I learnt the CRAFT of photography,using 5x4 and 10x8 technical cameras and traditional darkroom processes.Back then,pre-digital,I was very much of the F64 Group mindset.Have you heard of them? Traditional film is the closest you can get photographically to a pure recording of light.Therefore,those images should never have artificial retouching,only negative spotting if required.
Digital photography and traditional photography are two very different things.In fact,I dont even consider a digital image as a photograph at all,except for the way it is aquired.It is a FILE.It is an INTERPRETATION of light.It is generated by a processor.It is not a pure recording of light.Therefore,any further manipulation I do to it in photoshop,is valid because that 'image' is already an interpretation to begin with.If you see 'lines' or whatever from my post work,so what? I see digital images as 'throw-away',which means that I don't look at every single detail.I do them very quickly,perhaps 30 or 40 images in a session.They are meant to be viewed as slideshows,not hanging on my wall.
I do not seek approval from anyone.I only post here to use up my free space on the Magix server.After 20 years as a professional photographer,and even photographing royalty,I have nothing to prove.I therefore care nothing for silly star ratings or whether I've left enough 'space' at the top of a picture.:-)
was ist im Grunde ein gut Idea
aber zu sehen ist zu stark die Spur von Bearbeitung (Photospoped), was ist als
weißer Linie um der Skulptur.
Wenn noch das vorn wär heller, wär ganz gut.
Es ist auch möglich, Fotos zu machen mit Kamera, nicht nur mit PS oder PSP
oder CS
Aber so schlecht für nur 2* ist auch nicht, warum ich geb 4* für Anreiz.
.