Batch Conversion: Bug, deliberate design, or user error?

terrypin wrote on 7/23/2015, 8:14 AM

I suppose I've only used this feature a few time in the last couple of years. So I'm not confident of the following and would appreciate others trying to replicate it please.

It only seems to work if there's just a single movie (tab) in the project. With two or more I don't get the all-important initial dialogue:

Without that I found it impossible to perform my simple task, namely to export a dozen or so clips automatically. They happen to be in the second of two movies in my project.

As soon as a second movie tab is opened, even if empty, with either movie active, File > Batch conversion fails to ask which of those two distinct tasks you require.

I've done this same operation before several times over the years, but presumably always when working on a project not containing multiple movies.

As a work-around I had to first export that movie and re-import into a new project, before proceeding.

 

This is MEP 2014 Premium, but the same happens here with other recent vesions and I don't think MEP 2015 woulld differ.

Last changed by terrypin on 7/23/2015, 8:40 AM, changed a total of 4 times.

Terry, East Grinstead, UK. PC: i7 6700K, 4.0 GHz, 32GB with Win 10 pro. Used many earlier versions of MEPP, currently mainly MEPP 2016 & 2017 (Using scores of macro scripts to add functionality, tailored to these versions.)

Comments

johnebaker wrote on 7/23/2015, 11:19 AM

Hi Terry

. . . . It only seems to work if there's just a single movie (tab) in the project. With two or more I don't get the all-important initial dialogue: . . . .

Looking in the manual (p 216) I would say that is by design and depends on the scenario as described in the manual.

HTH

John EB

 

Last changed by johnebaker on 7/23/2015, 11:19 AM, changed a total of 2 times.

VPX 16, Movie Studio 2025, and earlier versions 2015 and 2016, Music Maker Premium 2024.

PC - running Windows 11 23H2 Professional on Intel i7-8700K 3.2 GHz, 16GB RAM, RTX 2060 6GB 192-bit GDDR6, 1 x 1Tb Sabrent NVME SSD (OS and programs), 2 x 4TB (Data) internal HDD + 1TB internal SSD (Work disc), + 6 ext backup HDDs.

Laptop - Lenovo Legion 5i Phantom - running Windows 11 24H2 on Intel Core i7-10750H, 16GB DDR4-SDRAM, 512GB SSD, 43.9 cm screen Full HD 1920 x 1080, Intel UHD 630 iGPU and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (6GB GDDR6)

Sony FDR-AX53e Video camera, DJI Osmo Action 3 and Sony HDR-AS30V Sports cams.

terrypin wrote on 7/23/2015, 4:15 PM

Thanks John, I agree after studying that more carefully. But it's a shame it's not flexible enough to suport the task I described. Not a particularly unusual requirement, I'd have thought?

However, that work-around I described was simple enough.

Last changed by terrypin on 7/23/2015, 4:15 PM, changed a total of 1 times.

Terry, East Grinstead, UK. PC: i7 6700K, 4.0 GHz, 32GB with Win 10 pro. Used many earlier versions of MEPP, currently mainly MEPP 2016 & 2017 (Using scores of macro scripts to add functionality, tailored to these versions.)

terrypin wrote on 8/9/2015, 1:47 AM

Responding yesterday to the identical query I made at the time, Ralf seems to share my initial view that it's a design flaw, or at least a feature that needs adding:

I agree -  I see no reason you  shouldn't get the dialogue to choose between the two different workflows when several movie tabs are in the project. The underlying logic is  probably not intuitive and/or based on some older generation of the  software. I will raise the question to our developers and ask them to  explain it or consider changing it. I would expect that you could always  get the option to batch convert the individual timeline objects, and for  this function to e.g. always pertain to the currently selected movie  tab. So, we will see what they have to say.

 

Last changed by terrypin on 8/9/2015, 1:47 AM, changed a total of 1 times.

Terry, East Grinstead, UK. PC: i7 6700K, 4.0 GHz, 32GB with Win 10 pro. Used many earlier versions of MEPP, currently mainly MEPP 2016 & 2017 (Using scores of macro scripts to add functionality, tailored to these versions.)